How Bruno Fagali Safeguards Against Corruption At New / SB

Bruno Fagali is a Brazilian attorney who has dedicated his career to fighting corruption. He has his own law office in Sao Paulo called Fagali Advocacy and he specializes in ethics, regulatory law, administrative law, urban law, and anti-corruption. He also works for new / sb which is an advertising agency that has a large number of contracts with the Brazilian government. He is this company’s Corporate Integrity Manager. Additionally, he serves the Society of Corporate Compliance & Ethics as a coordinator and specialist.

It was at the University of Sao Paulo that Bruno Fagali earned his Master in Law. He has earned additional legal specializations including Advertising Law, Electoral Law, Public Law, and Parliamentary Law. He has worked in the legal field for over seven years.

At new / sb, Bruno Fagali reviews the contracts that the agency signs with the government making sure they are above board and ethical. Corruption is a serious issue in Brazil and there have been reforms put in place by President Michel Temer since he took over in an attempt to eliminate this issue in the country to the largest extent possible. As new / sb is focused on communicating in the public interest, Bruno Fagali is needed in order to adopt practices of transparency at the agency.

When anti-corruption laws were enacted two years ago, new / sb acknowledged that they needed to bring a legal expert in to design and implement their new corporate integrity plan. Bruno Fagali designed this plan jointly with a new Employee Ethics Committee that was also formed. In order to further safeguard against corruption, Bruno Fagali was made unfireable for the first 36 months of his contract so that he couldn’t be unduly influenced by the executive at the advertising agency.

To know more visit @

SEC Whistleblower Experts Continue To Find Legal Success

The announcement that Labaton Sucharow’s SEC Whistleblower attorney team has been part of the second largest award for an individual in the history of the program should come as no surprise to those with a knowledge of the financial industry. The Labaton Sucharow team has been built specifically with the assistance of individuals calling attention to financial wrongdoing taking place in the financial industry, with attorney Jordan A. Thomas leading the team after spending much of his recent history working to help write the Dodd-Frank Act; the Dodd-Frank Act established the SEC Whistleblower program and the Investor Protection Fund that pays financial awards to whistleblowers whose information assists a case being brought.

The latest award of $17 million has been given to an individual who assisted the Securities and Exchange Commission in finding evidence of financial wrongdoing by members of the financial industry. In an interview given by Jordan A. Thomas after the case was successfully brought to an end the attorney explained his belief that many more individuals would begin to come forward to reveal what they believe to be financial issues with companies across the board. Read more:

The team at Labaton Sucharow have been assembled to make sure every aspect of any whistleblowers activities are examined and investigated before the case is even brought to the attention of the SEC; the team hope to make sure each and every case they bring is of the highest quality to ensure the best chance of success. Not only will the team attempt to secure the best possible award for the individual whistleblower they represent, but they also work hard to make sure each individual has their anonymity protected throughout any case to avoid any retaliation taking place from an employer or other employees of a company.

The SEC also works to protect the identities of individual whistleblowers by not revealing details of which cases were brought because of whistleblower information, and paying awards based on fines levied from the Investor Protection Fund. Jordan A. Thomas understands the problems facing those who become whistleblowers in the financial industry after being involved in cases of retaliation against individual whistleblowers and other major issues that have made him sure of the need for anonymity for all who bring evidence.